The media have been gasping in horror over claims that Mitt Romney
engaged in gay bashing 50 years ago in high school, including one iconic
incident in which he brutally hacked off a gay student's bleached blond
locks.
Except that said student, John Lauber, wasn't openly gay. When interviewed by the non-partisan Auto Weekly
before the haircut story surfaced in the mainstream media, key witness
Phillip Maxwell never even mentioned the supposedly traumatizing
incident.
Maxwell, a Democrat, did offer that Romney was
disciplined, focused, and smart, and would probably make a great
president-points that somehow didn't make it into the trim 5,500-word Post piece, no doubt due to space restrictions. One tipoff that the Post may have been proffering a biased report was its admission that most of the five witnesses it interviewed were Democrats.
The
Post originally reported that another classmate, Stu White, had "long
been bothered" by the incident-then had to publish a correction stating
that White never knew about the incident until an unnamed source relayed
it to him several weeks ago.
Lauber's three sisters issued statements expressing their disavowal of the Post's portrayal of their deceased brother and their distress over his use as a political prop.
Other details of the report claim that Romney teased another closeted gay student at Cranbrook School, though the Post confesses that other students and even teachers used language similar to Romney's.
Liberal commentators have studiously ignored the 95% of the Post
report that focused on Romney's leadership in dozens of school
organizations, extensive community service, robust work ethic, and
all-around popularity and joviality, even as cited by many of the
"victims" of his pranks.
The Post notes that Cranbrook
was especially strict, and that it frequently expelled students for tiny
infractions. If Romney was breaking rules and causing mayhem left and
right, he sure was discreet about it.
What do we know about
Romney's character later in life? We know that, much more recently than
high school, he risked his life to save a family of six and their dog
from drowning in a boating accident in 2003. Have you heard about that
in the Post recently? Do you think you would have heard about it had Barack Obama done the same thing?
We
also know that in 1996 Romney shut down Bain Capital for a week and
sent his 30-person staff to New York City to scour the streets looking
for a partner's missing daughter, who had traveled there for a rave and
been abducted while on ecstasy. In a campaign commercial for Romney's
gubernatorial run, the partner tearfully credited Romney with saving his
daughter's life.
Such stories belie the mainstream media's
portrayal of Romney as lacking in humanity and prone to "targeting the
vulnerable," as New York Times columnist Charles Blow put it.
Targeting the vulnerable? Targeting the vulnerable for being in need of
his life-saving assistance, perhaps.
How many lives has Obama saved with his bare hands or his personal financial resources?
Meanwhile,
since we're talking about high school and character, we know from
Obama's autobiography that he "enthusiastically" used marijuana and
cocaine and abused alcohol to such an extent that he spent his last two
high school years in a "daze." We don't know what bad behavior Obama
might have been up to in his twenties, but we do know that he
steadfastly refuses to release his college or law school transcripts.
More importantly, we know that while his political career was ascendant, the young Obama sleazily knocked
his three respected opponents for the Illinois State Senate off the
ballot in 1996, by challenging their candidacy petition signatures based
on technicalities. He also eliminated another opponent for Senate in
2004 by forcing open his challenger's sealed divorce records.
We
know that Obama hobnobbed with unrepentant domestic terrorists Bill
Ayers and Bernadine Dohrn, launched his political career in their home,
attended for 20 years the church of anti-American preacher Jeremiah
Wright, possibly tried to bribe Wright into silence before the November 2008 election, and marched with the New Black Panthers five short years ago.
Paul
Begala argues the Romney bullying stories show that the candidate is a
"serial abuser of power." Begala claims that one can "draw a straight
line" from the man who orchestrated the alleged hippie-shearing to the
one who laid off hundreds of employees while at Bain and "slashed
education" while governor of Massachusetts.
Serial abuser of
power? How about applying that label to the president who exploded the
number of czars in the federal government, regularly plots to embolden
left-wing federal agency heads to act unilaterally if Congress won't
immediately implement his plans, and brags about putting his boots on
people's necks, kicking their asses, and punishing his enemies? How
about the president who threatens the Supreme Court that they had better
not engage in judicial review of his signature legislation? How about
the president who forms an enemies list of private citizens who
contribute to his competitor's campaign?
One commenter breaks down
the Begala piece: "It is tough when you have to deconstruct a
monogamous, nondrinking, nonsmoking, honest Mormon who pays millions in
taxes and gives millions to charities. You have to resort to high school
pranks to turn a good man into a bully."
A friend and I once
debated which is more pathetic: a twenty-something or fifty-something
left-wing radical. My friend argued the former, because the
fifty-something has the strength of his convictions to hold them till
adulthood. I argued the latter, since we often grow out of youthful
indiscretions and poorly thought-out ideologies through experience and
wisdom.
Romney may have been a bit of a bully 50 years ago, which
he regrets and apologizes for. Obama flirted with radicalism in his
youth, a dalliance that has since blossomed into a full-blown, committed
relationship.
No comments:
Post a Comment